Lord Of The Flies Literature Critique Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper Throughout Chapters six, seven, and eight, Golding concentrating on Simon for being alone, and different from the other male childs. He depicts Simon as a black sheep in which the other male child # 8217 ; s disfavor. One such illustration is that the other male child # 8217 ; s are ever doing merriment of him, and despite that, Simon neer retaliates with returning verbal onslaughts. One large difference in Simon from the other male child # 8217 ; s, is that Simon does non fear the animal. Simon knows that animal is the immorality within, but Simon is pure. Simon is besides about saintly, for case, when Simon fed the small kids, this is a saintly gesture. This besides shows that Simon is the lone 1 who isn # 8217 ; Ts concerned with merely him, but he cares for the well being of the others excessively. Another illustration of Simon # 8217 ; s pureness is when the Lord of the Flies tempts him. We will write a custom essay sample on Lord Of The Flies Literature Critique Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He falls unconsciously to avoid the persuasion and enticement of immorality. Simon is the obvious fulcrum in the good and bad spectrum. On one terminal ballad Ralph, and on the other terminal lay Jack. One thing that Golding does is making Simon as a Christ-like figure. Simon is the purest of all the male childs. Simon does non follow orders, nor does he give them. He will non perpetrate Acts of the Apostless of force, nor will he diss the male childs who insult him. Golding is invariably giving Simon more and more Christ-like features and traits. From the pureness of his bosom, to the Lord of the Files trying to allure him. Another thing Golding does frequently, is use the literary tool of symbolism. Almost all of the of import facets of the book involve symbolism. Simon symbolizes a Christ-like figure. The Lord of the Flies symbolizes the Satan. When Simon fell unconscious, that represented the forfeits that had to be made in order to get the better of immorality. The last major symbolism was Ralph and Simon mounting the stones, in which Simon finished foremost. That was to demo that although Ralph has leading and power, Simon is the 1 who should be taking. He has the pureness an d the bosom to make it. Another literary tool used by Golding is apposition. Golding juxtaposes good and evil, Satan and Christ, life and decease, world and dreams, Heaven and Hell, and so on. The intent of this was to demo that the things that need to be done in order to last must be accomplished through the antonym. For case, The male child # 8217 ; s redemption ( heaven ) lies in the custodies of the fire ( snake pit ) that will signal a deliverance ship. Another case is the Lord of the Flies ( Satan ) speaking and alluring Simon ( Christ ) , like what happened in the desert in which Christ was stuck in for 40 yearss. Golding intentionally composes Simon as a Christ-like figure, but more significantly juxtaposes the pure good of Simon following to many signifiers of Evil. Among those evil signifiers lay fire, enticement, autarchy, killing, verbal blasting, animals, and Satan. The chief immorality signifiers nevertheless lay in the fire, the bossy regulation, and the animal. First, the fire: The fire acts as a redemption from the evil island, freedom. To accomplish freedom, one must utilize the prisoner of war ers of evil. The fire represents not only physical salvation, but also mental salvation for Simon as well. Simon must mentally overcome the fire’s salvation. He cannot be tempted by evil he must use his purity in order to obtain complete salvation. If Simon did fall to the dark forces of evil, he would surely be off the island or would he? He would live the remainder of his life pondering over what would have happened if he stuck with good. He fell for evil and because of it he never achieved mental salvation, his mind would forever live on the island. The next major evil is the autocratic rule imposed on by Ralph and Jack. They represent the very rulers who sent Christ to the hill to be crucified. They wanted complete control over the people and their beliefs, as do Jack and Ralph. They will send Simon to his grave, perhaps not on a cross, but they will send Simon to his final grave. Unfortunately, the good versus evil battles which are fought, will usually be won by bad in the beginning, and hopefully fall in the end. In history, Christ was killed when he was the good. Hitler killed the Jews, when Hitler was the evil one. Ralph and jack will kill Simon, when he is the good one. Through out history, it shows that in order for the bad to make themselves look good, they must destroy those who are really good. The last evil form I will focus on is the beast. The reason why Simon is never afraid of the beast, but the others are, is because, Simon is the beast. The beast is not really evil; he is viewed as evil. The beast is really the good, Simon, the purist of all. To the bad, the good is bad; thus Simon is viewed as the beast. Not a flying animal, or a huge squid, but the pure white heart of a human being is the real beast in the eyes of the evil. Not all the boys are evil, but if they follow the autocratic ways of Ralph or Jack, they have been corrupted by evil. In a sense, what are viewed as far as the beast, are complete opposites. The beast, which i s viewed as bad, is in fact good. The bad now fears the good, where as usually the good fear the bad. It is one big paradox with good and evil. Why are the bad so fearsome of the beast which is good, since there is an overwhelming amount of the bad, opposed to just one pure good character? Perhaps evil knows, and has always known that good will prevail over evil, despite circumstances. I feel that evil fear the good beast only because it poses a threat to the autocratic rule of the evil island. In my opinion, Lord of the Flies creates a new Ying yang, one of all black (evil) and only one small dot of white (good). The black represents all the evil on the island, and the small white dot symbolizes Simon, the one small bit of pure white good. Despite the temptations and overwhelming amount of evil to good, the small bit of good will never give up. Good fights and lives until it is destroyed, but will never surrender over to the dark side. If the world should ever become this Ying yang , what will happen when the good is swallowed by the evil?

Loss of Freedom Through Apathy essays

Loss of Freedom Through Apathy essays We do have freedom in this country but we simply choose to ignore it. We live in a democracy, the most just kind of government, where the people hold supreme power. It is an institution that is a culmination of revolutions, wars, philosophies and heroes. It is the greatest and proudest government in the world. One reason for this is that Americans have a right that citizens of Iraq and China and North Korea only dreamed they could have. It took one of the greatest military epics in history for our Founding Fathers to receive this right. It took the marching of thousands for women to achieve this right. It took 400 years of abuse for blacks too finally win this right. It is the highest and purest form of freedom of speech and as Americans it is our single most powerful instrument of self government. It is the American vote and in this Presidential election it is a right 250 million chose to ignore. This year I had the great opportunity to volunteer my services to the Democratic party. I was excited to work for the Democrats because it was my first ever experience involved with the election. For 17 years I stood as a common bystander to this great American tradition. Volunteering my hours made me feel like I was a part of something important. Mostly my work consisted of random polling. I would call people up between the hours of 7 and 9:00 P.M. and ask them a few questions about the election. With every call I hoped for the best, but it seemed that I was calling people at the time they were most irritable. Most would simply hang up, leaving with a polite "Oh, I'm not interested." Others acted militantly to my calling, slamming the phone in disgust. It startled and in a way disheartened me, the way many of the people I polled seemed totally apathetic to the political world around us. To me, spending a minute answering questions about the future of politics did not seem like to o much to ask at all. Yet ...